(i) Mean is the suitable measure of central tendency because every term is taken in
calculation, it is effected by every item. It can further be subjected to algebraic treatment unlike other measures i.e. median and mode. As mean is rigidly defined, it is mostly used for comparing the various issues.
For example, the marks obtained by the seven students are 10, 15, 14, 18, 26, 24, 20, 14 and 27.
Mean = 
= 168/9 = 18.67
But median of 10, 15, 14, 18, 26, 24, 20, 14 and 27 is 18 and mode is 14.
From above example we conclude that mean is rigidly defined and the marks 18.67 represent the performance of 9 students, but median and mode are not so rigidly defined.
(ii) (a) Mean is much affected by the extreme value but median is not much affected by these
extremes.
For example, if there are 5 terms: 4, 7, 12, 18, 19
Mean
is 12 in this case and median is 12.
If we add two values 450 and 1000 the new mean = 
=
= 215.7
This is a big change as compared to the size of first five terms’ mean but new median of 4, 7, 12, 18, 19, 450, 1000 is 18 which is not so much changed as compared to the size of first five terms’ median.
So we conclude that the mean misrepresents the result if extreme values are present in the data.
(b) Sometimes mean gives impossible conclusion e.g. if there are 60, 50 and 42 students in three classes then mean number of students is
= 50.67, which is impossible as students cannot be in fractions. But median of 42, 50 and 60 is 50.